I'll be the first to admit the Clintons are hyping this for all it's worth if the Obamanauts will admit that he did an incredibly dumb thing by making statements on camera that were remotely ambiguous about Reagan and the Republicans being the party of ideas for the past 15 years. And don't deny he said it I've heard it with my own ears. I don't think for a moment the voters of SC believe he's a closet Reagan lover but it's hard to believe there isn't some eye rolling and O man comments because that's what I did.  

But challenging Bill Clinton to a joust when Obama was only wearing leather armor, now that was REALLY dumb.

yeah, how long did the Obama's think they could attack Clinton and smear her before they got it back?

I guess your analogy works if you want to compare Bill Clinton to a bloodthirsty carnivorous beast who will sink fangs and sharp claws into his prey and enjoy the act of disemboweling him... but I'm not sure that is the image you want to be painting for your candidate's chief surrogate - but frankly, that's the way he is coming across these days

Simply brilliant diary.

Did anybody notice all the cable news shows,most regular news channels,most of the newspapers
running stories that a lot of Democrats privately
telling them that Bill Clinton is damaging his reputation,his legacy etc. by 'attacking' Obama etc..

Bill is hurting Hillary's campaign so and so. He is mad,uncontrollable etc. This kind of narration
also coming from Republican radio shows, conservative leaning reportes.

Here is the interesting point. Yesterday between
his rants against Clintons, Chis Matthews unintendly opened his mind while talking to his
guest speakers.( We all know his soft corner for
Rudy Juliani and his suffering ever since Rudy's
meltdown few weeks ago.). In a low tone filled with anxiety asking his guest, can Rudy be able to compete with Hillary if he becomes nominee .
This question coming from Chris Mattews after his take or his usual dose of criticism against Hillary on Monday's debate.

Folks that is grudging respect. Unfortunately we dont see that most of the time while these guys conducting their shows.

Similar case with these guys criticism against
Bill Clinton. Bill Clinton has done by himself  what a responsible Entire Media didnt do and ought to be doing. He has pointed that distinctions and Obama's limitations so persuasively to undecided and uninformed voter.
He has done it so effectively.

In all these incidents he communicated the distinctions without one single personal attack
on Obama, contrary to what media says, twists.
I have not a single remark that is derogatory to
Mr. Obama personally. Everthing targeted to the
capabilities,polices,experience  or lack of them.

Now they(some unnamed? Democrats and a few others) are trying to Bully,discourage,planting
doubts to Clinton campaig to make Bill Clinton not do what is very effectively doing(he wouldnt
have done it, if we have a responsible media).

The thing with Clintons is that they dont listen to these pundits and weak boned Democrats. Especially Bill Clinton has this unique ability to listen to his instinct which is very superior and right on target for so many of his victories against Republicans. Thats is the difference and margin he has achieved and rest of the Democrats lacked in their pusuit against Republicans.

Remind you so far Obama has not substantively refuted any of the things Bill Clinton said(not counting the rhetoric).

My respect for Bill Clinton increased a bit while seeing this entire fiasco for the last few weeks.

I can understand why he is the only Democrat who elected twice since FDR.